Vegetation management in Queensland – a Case of Constitutional Vandalism
More in IPA review
Suri Ratnapala, Professor of Law and Director, Centre for Public, International and Comparative Law, T C Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland
The guilt of a person accused of a vegetation clearing offence under the VMA is determined not by a court but by an official. (The judicial trials mandated by Division 3 have no application to vegetation clearing offences under the VMA). If an authorised officer issues a compliance notice, a failure to comply without a reasonable excuse results in an automatic penalty. (Maximum of 1665 penalty units or $ 116,550 - s.55) The innocuous term ‘compliance notice’ masks what is actually a straightforward conviction and sentence without trial.
ce.
The legislation I examine is Queensland’s Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VMA)
Design with Nature
Enjoy your work in the natural world. No token environmental rhetoric here. Respect the realities of nature. Ensure the risks are minimal by studying both the physics and chemistry of resilience . Serious environmental risk analysis and action suggestions on specific areas of Victoria esp
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home