I will start taking the Greens seriously when they start using several critical eco words such as "harvest, production and sequestration " in their proper scientific and ecological context .(You will note that I am a professional green -A small g green ; a bit like , I might be a small l " liberal" too !)
At the moment " harvesting" talk is forbotten ( at least in Australia) ;its a swear word which churchgoers and Brown devotees can expect to receive a feeling of guilt for if they should use it or ask more questions about it( say in relation to native timber harvesting ) The worshippers cherry pick their current favoured form of sequestration and reject , on theological grounds alone , the environmentally sound choices that work . Scientists amongst the audience will note that I am not spelling it all out in words because for many Greens the game is about using the right words - not the right science - the science that is, in substance, a process. So much for the brilliance of their theology; so much for the Green's commitment to understanding, and understanding the process of ecological sustainability.
Greenlabor are so out of touch that they promote carbon dioxide production when they claim its critical to reduce it . Make up your minds people, or you become totally politically and scientifically irrelevant. The Greens do confusion and religion by playing with sequestration subjects that suit their simple theories but ignore key subjects which would in fact sequester carbon. Green theology is ideologically constrained irrelevance
and useless as a result .
Minister Burke is such a dummy to fall again in late 2011 for the easy "lock up idea" that has left the religious Greens in the doldrums for decades ( All the hype on the abcnews and by Burke on proposed Coral sea exclusion zone proposals)
Clearly Greenlabor are unable to address the complex questions of management ( what most of do at work well )so they opt to opt out of management altogether .Clearly not many of these wannabes would survive in business.
Sadly the opposition haven't responded by advocating a reasoned way to define and protect wilderness and wild things.
--Harvesting/ production - what one trophic level does with another
--Sequestration - what prevents decomposition; something that they favor for forests
I won't say any more . This stupidity is seriously stupid, but unfortunately few know why . Those of U who KNOW the cycles and what U are talking about need no more information .
If on the other hand you just don't know and you are serious about the truth, follow professional practical big picture here .
Labels: career, sequestration, sustainability